Saying "it's worst than Spider-man" and leave it at that makes no sense. You can have only one copy of Spider-man, this lets you play Spider-man AND 3 copies of an event that thwarts as much as him. You don't have to choose.
Alianza. (Los jugadores pueden pagar los costes de esta carta en grupo.)
Acción de Héroe: Quita 3 de Amenaza de un Plan secundario.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16b0e/16b0e61769d5c50480475cff8ac1f3269c0b99a0" alt="Investigación en grupo"
This card's cost is 2 Per Player not 2. In a 3 player game for 6 it removes 9 which you can do for cheaper and more effectively with Spider-Man. Depending on the side scheme status, Even the Odds is likely a better play as well.
I get that Alliance means everyone can pitch in for the side scheme here but overall not a great include. Would depend on what you can cut for it. If you have less than 3 Overwatch and Psychic Manipulation in your deck then you don't have room for this.
This is not a dead card. It clears almost all player side schemes in the game. And it scales to multiplayer. In a multiplayer game you can play Build Support or Superpower Training and on the same turn clear it allowing everyone to tutor out a powerful support/identity upgrade. For perspective the equivalent would be like if every player in that game had a For Justice in hand and played it as a request action.
I think in solo this card is a weaker For Justice because it lacks the bonus +1 opportunity but if you are really needing extra THW like in a Sinister Six matchup and have already slotted in x3 For Justice, it isn’t the worst thing in the world.
Fantasy Flight missed the mark with this card. Their intention to make a multi-player scaling card was good, their execution was not. To properly scale multiplayer cards the format needs to be: (Flat value below curve plus 1 value per player). The end result of this format should be a clearly bad card at solo, close to even with other staples at 2, and then above average value at 3-4.
To fix this card it needs to read: 2-Cost: Alliance, Remove 2 threat, plus 1 additional threat per-player from a side scheme.
At Solo this would under-perform compared to what For Justice, Crisis Averted, and Multitasking can accomplish.
At 2 Players this would come up even with For Justice with the added restriction of side-scheme only targeting but the added utility of min/maxing player hands via alliance.
At 3-4 Players this would be a clear auto-include over/alongside For-Justice.